tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16979618.post9185548968140996781..comments2009-06-11T09:32:37.955-07:00Stan Shawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14027446150855414929noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16979618.post-41385899609326729552009-06-11T09:32:37.955-07:002009-06-11T09:32:37.955-07:00I think my &quot;B&quot; theory may apply here. I&#39;m sure space may&#39;ve been a consideration, but then the editor(s) would weigh their perceptions of a piece--and if the art is equal, the fallback criteria would be the text. And trust me, it&#39;s rare when editors think beyond the obvious.<br /><br />Jesse Marinoff ReyesJesse Marinoff Reyesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16979618.post-46289072735536560682009-06-08T16:48:30.689-07:002009-06-08T16:48:30.689-07:00Nachos, <br />Thanks, I can be lazy about hands, but on this page I did do my homework.<br />Jesse,<br />I&#39;m not at all sure. The whole thing went so fast, and I had minimal contact with the editor, so I never explained the page. I figured I got bumped due to space considerations.Stan Shawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14027446150855414929noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16979618.post-34700630009611926112009-06-08T16:32:10.004-07:002009-06-08T16:32:10.004-07:00I&#39;m curious, did DH know what your rationale was for the &quot;mash-up&quot; text? One tends to suspect that they may not have gone with it if A) they didn&#39;t &quot;get&quot; it, or B) they would think that the reader wouldn&#39;t &quot;get&quot; it. Wouldn&#39;t be the first time editorial decisions were based on underestimating the intellect of the reader.<br /><br />Jesse Marinoff ReyesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16979618.post-66125995088960571202009-06-08T12:17:48.693-07:002009-06-08T12:17:48.693-07:00you draw the best hands. Rock on.NineInchNachoshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01570704490314236932noreply@blogger.com